[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3
amcleod at caribsurf.com
Sat Sep 21 21:32:53 PDT 2013
If I recall,the amateur satellite community were instrumental in
pioneering the 'secondary payload' concept. Pity nobody thought to
patent the idea!
On 09/22/2013 12:04 AM, Jim Jerzycke wrote:
> "The actual launch cost is in the hundreds of millions"
> Not quite.
> I work for a commercial launch provider, and the cost to put a large
> satellite (DirecTV or Intelsat) into GTO is $95~$110 million, inclusive.
> You ship it to us, and we'll get it into space at the correct
> injection point.
> Since we're always looking for new revenue streams, I specifically
> brought up the possibility of releasing cubesats or "other" secondary
> payloads before primary spacecraft separation, or after if better, as
> I know we have the capability to support it.
> Top management replied (and knowing these guys personally I have no
> reason to doubt them) that they looked into it seriously, BUT.....
> Since we don't build the "Payload Accommodation" (launch adapter,
> satellite support structure, fairing, avionics, ordinance, etc), we're
> at the mercy of the contractor who does build it to add in the
> capability of multiple satellite deployments, and the cost figure they
> came back with made it "economically infeasible to offer a secondary
> payload deployment service".
> So while you may see launch providers that say they have the
> capability to drop off secondary payloads on their way to GTO, once
> you start talking "How much?", you'll find the game changes rapidly.
> 73, Jim KQ6EA
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB