[amsat-bb] Re: A0 40 replacement

Brenton Salmi kb1lqd at gmail.com
Thu Sep 5 12:04:47 PDT 2013

The modular SDR board for universities is exactly what Fox-1 and  Fox-2 (as
well as future Fox's) aim to do! Unfortunatly noone here will get details
on the current specs or design due to ITAR restrictions but if you become
part of the Fox project engineers you'll see what's going on.

* I'll leave this e-mail with just a thought: *

*“Just remember - when you think all is lost, the future remains”* - Robert

Engineering is about doing things people say can't be done, think about the
size/power requirements of satellites 20 years ago, 10 years, ago... their
functional density....

It's not impossible, just difficult!


Brent, KB1LQD

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:37 AM, M5AKA <m5aka at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> > But what if the SDX that flew on ARISSat, or the one
> > that will be developed for the Future of the Fox series could be "sold"
> (or
> > given) to the university cubesat community as a radio capable of being
> used
> > to deliver science data?
> Hi Zach,
> Unfortunately there goes the CubeSat's power budget.
> The SDX transponders have an overhead, not just in terms of the physical
> space they occupy, but the amount of power they consume.
> I believe the most efficient SDX transponder has an overhead of some 350
> mW above the power consumed by an analog linear transponder and a linear
> transponder itself would consume more power than a standard 9600 bps
> CubeSat telemetry module.
> So it appears to be a non-starter for 1U CubeSats. Might be feasible on 3U
> CubeSats but it would mean much less power would be available for other
> experiments on the CubeSat.
> The question is what's in it for the CubeSat team ? The answer may be a
> higher data rate, the existing 9600 bps just isn't fast enough. In theory,
> depending on the modulation employed, a 30 kHz bandwidth SDX transponder
> could generate a 96 kbps downlink which is much more useful. To some the
> trade-off of power budget for downlink speed may prove appealing.
> At the moment it's all theoretical but certainly worth considering when a
> FOX-2 SDX transponder has been proven to work in space.
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list