[amsat-bb] Re: Working SO-50
pe0sat at vgnet.nl
Sun Dec 4 12:58:41 PST 2011
Thanks for the information.
One thing I would like to add to the people that use HRD and a FT-847.
I tryed many times to work SO-50 but I am unable to do this with HRD.
When I want to make a QSO via SO-50 I allways have to use SatPC32.
I haven't figured out why CTCSS and HRD isn't working with SO-50.
73 Jan PE0SAT
On Sat, December 3, 2011 21:45, Ib Christoffersen wrote:
> Working SO-50.
> I think it is time to look at how one can operate over SO-50 and the
> problems that can be encountered.
> First the normal and nominal data:
> Uplink is at 145.850 MHz. Downlink at 436.795 MHz.
> If it is not ON - use 74.4 Hz CTCSS tone to activate the transmitter for
> seconds to have it on for nominally 10 minutes - when on use 67 Hz CTCSS
> tone during your transmission.
> That was the intended normal operation.
> Now to the deviations from the normal scheme.
> The downlink frequency sometimes jump approximately 5 kHz. Therefore I
> two different frequencies pairs to be used in SATPC32:
> If you do not use Full Doppler Tracking it is not much of an issue. Just
> tune for best downlink.
> Talking about SATPC32 here are the entries for the CTCSS tone:
> The first data is for the ICOM IC-910 radio. If you use another radio
> look at the information in SATPC32.
> Next problem is the change of polarity of the downlink signal during a
> The polarity changes during the pass. At least I have to switch polarity a
> few times from RHCP to LHCP to optimize the downlink signal. That has been
> confirmed by others. How it works using linearly polarized antennas I do
> know - but I think there will be some fading.
> And if that is not enough - at least here over Europe - we have to put up
> with QRM on the uplink from a lot of different sources like repeaters and
> people using our frequencies as cheap phone connections.
> The result of the QRM is that it sometimes is difficult to turn SO-50 on.
> Also the QRM may turn the transmitter off.
> And since the inclination is not sun synchronous we have to live with a
> steady change of pass times over the year.
> Some may think I am not a fan of SO-50. That is not the case. It is a very
> good satellite we got for free and it works very well.
> Already more people are using it over Europe after AO-51 is not with us
> more. That just took a couple of days.
> 73 OZ1MY/Ib
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/
More information about the AMSAT-BB