[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: further late reply regarding ISS simplex
- Subject: [sarex] Re: further late reply regarding ISS simplex
- From: "Ransom, Kenneth G. \(JSC-OC\)[BAR]" <kenneth.g.ransom@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:10:49 -0500
"In Space There are NO borders."
BUT on Earth there are and you must abide by those regulations to talk
to space.
Kenneth - N5VHO
-----Original Message-----
From: sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org [mailto:sarex-bounces@AMSAT.Org] On Behalf
Of MM
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:48 AM
To: McGrane; Manned space BBS
Subject: [sarex] Re: further late reply regarding ISS simplex
I agree.
In Space There are NO borders.
Why do we have Regions.
Regions reduces the crews abilities to enjoy the Amateur Radio project.
wf1f
--- McGrane <tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us> wrote:
>
> Greetings from patrick N2OEQ
>
> Despite support of the present frequency scheme for the ISS I still
> wish to disagree with the policy of split operation with different
> phone uplinks.
>
> Back when the MIR was up, the russians operated simplex and left the
> radio on to listen for callers.
> On several occasions, I called the MIR according to my tracking
> program and was rewarded several times with a response.
>
> With two different uplink frequencies, the astronauts are less
> inclined to leave the radio on to listen for callers.
>
> When there were several callers here on simplex responding to a CQ
> call from the MIR, we acted civilized and took turns and everyone made
> contacts so I dont buy the absolute need for split operation.
> Besides, how many callers could there be within 20 or 30 miles up to
> the horizon.
>
> We've had years of robot like amateur radio on the ISS. How about
> loosening the ties!
>
> Thanks for the soapbox..... pat
>
>
> ----
> Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, visit
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, visit http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, visit http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/sarex
AMSAT Home