[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: ISS reception
- Subject: Re: [sarex] ISS reception
- From: "Scott Avery WA6LIE" <wa6lie@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:25:54 -0800
- Seal-Send-Time: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:25:54 -0800
GOT BEAMS?
All I can say..
That's what it takes these days vis ISS. :(
73, Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "McGrane" <tmcgrane@suffolk.lib.ny.us>
To: <sarex@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: [sarex] ISS reception
>
> Greetings
>
> I am having trouble hearing the ISS. The downlink is very weak.
>
> Does anyone know what the power output setting of the kenwood 700 is
> currently?
>
> The old ericcson ht packet station was stronger.
>
> Just a thought: could the ericcson station be used for packet and the
> kenwood 700 be used for phone?
>
> All comments welcome, thanks, 73, patrick n2oeq
>
>
> ----
> Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home