RE: [sarex] iss packet

["Christensen, Eric" <CHRISTENSENE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And then when all these neighborhood uplinks all collide because the modem
isn't looking at the uplink to time its' packet uplink transmission...

-----Original Message-----
From: RogerKola@aol.com [mailto:RogerKola@aol.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 11:48
To: CHRISTENSENE@MAIL.ECU.EDU
Cc: Sarex@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [sarex] iss packet


In a message dated 12/27/03 10:56:37 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
CHRISTENSENE@MAIL.ECU.EDU writes:

> Well, that is basically what I'm talking about.  Have the split freq 
> for  voice and have simplex for digital and that way the data won't 
> bother the  ISS crew because they'll be monitoring the voice uplink 
> freq.

But then hams in the more populated areas have to listen to all the 
"neighborhood" packet uplinks, which compete with ISS on the downlink
frequency.....

Roger
WA1KAT
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org