[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: ISS Hoax

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bruce Bostwick <lihan161051@earthlink.net>
To: <sarex@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [sarex] ISS Hoax

> This is why I suggested a while back that future payloads to ISS be 
> focused primarily on surface-surface operations 

With all respect, I desagree. 
Why? Well, because then ISS would be just like any ordinary sat. 
And it is not! It has people inside, and that's the special about it. 
For me the goal is to talk to the crew, not to use some gadget
attached to repeat/digipeat my transmission.
Ok, I know that's ok when the crew it's not avaliable, but if
priority isn't voice QSO's, then there is a serious risk the 
astro/cosmonauts simply forget about ham radio. And then 
voice contacts will be more rare than now...
Please don't think I'm saying this as an outsider. Me, like many 
of you, tracked all possible ISS windows last weekend. 
Despite many call's, I heard nothing in return.
But that's the way it is! Except ARISS QSO's, there isn't any 
sure ISS contact in advance. And that what makes a voice 
QSO with ISS so special! "Hunt" them it's part of the game! 
Why change the rules at "half term"???

73 F.Costa, CT1EAT

P.S. On a side note, allow me to advice you all to read the
        "Dragonfly - NASA and the crisis aboard MIR", by
        Bryan Burrough. It's a light reading about the worst 
        period of MIR life, and there are several mentions 
        about ham radio. It also helps us to understand why 
        the crew it's not always on the mood to talk with us. 
        Actually, after I read it I realised how amazing was to 
        have talked with Valery Korzun just 4 days after the fire!!!

Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org