Re: [sarex] Shuttle landing delay

["A10382" <a10382@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Larry,

It would certainly make for some additional and very interesting contacts.

However, I would imagine that the normally short return trip from the ISS is
too hectic for much hobby com.

And... everything carried has to have fuel carried for it.  I had thought I
read that it's something like 10,000 pounds of fuel for every pound of
payload.  If that's the ratio, then it might cost NASA upwards of $20,000 to
carry a one pound HT and an 8oz antenna to orbit.. $$-ouch-ouch-$$.

Frank

 ._._.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Faehling" <kl7ibv@amsat.org>
To: "SAREX" <sarex@amsat.org>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:53 PM
Subject: [sarex] Shuttle landing delay


> Too bad the shuttles don't have 2 meters installed.  I'm sure they would
> find the diversion during this time very pleasant, as well as us.
> ____________________________________________
>
> Larry Faehling
> Amateur Radio KL7IBV in Wisconsin
> "I read somewhere that 77 per cent
> of all the mentally ill live in poverty.
> Actually, I'm more intrigued by the
> 23 per cent who are apparently doing
> quite well for themselves."
>  (Jerry Garcia - Grateful Dead)
>
>
> ----
> Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>


---
Outgoing email Certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/02
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org