[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

ISS Field Day Classification and a few questions...

Class A stations (club or non club with 3 licensed amateurs) set up 
specifically for Field Day.

         ISS has 3 licensed Amateurs.  Not set up specifically for Field 
Day.  (Paul has this one right.)

Class B states 2 or less licensed Amateurs.

Class C states MOBILE and normally run that way including aeronautical mobile.

Class D is not an option.

Class E states "Home Station, Emergency Power"

         While I would consider the ISS a home.  I would say the power 
supply is other than emergency, but rather NORMAL POWER.  IMHO.

I would say class C is most appropriate.  The rules have also changed a bit 
it looks like.  In the past they read "number of transmitters BELOW 30 
MHz"  This would make the space station "0C" (zero charlie) since its not 
transmitting below 30MHz.  But this year it appears a little different.  So 
I would say 1C.  But what about the section?  Rule 5 says they would send 
"DX"  So "1C DX" would be my argument.

BUT, as Paul pointed out, rule number 1 says IARU Region 2 only to submit 
entries.  What if the ISS didn't submit an entry?  Rule 1 also says DX 
stations residing in other regions may be contacted for credit.  If you 
contacted someone in Germany, wouldn't your log entry be "1D DX"?  If so, 
then why not "1C DX" for the ISS?

What region is space?  Should the ARRL have a section for space?!  If there 
are people (Americans) living in space (now and in the future), shouldn't 
they be able to participate in Field Day.  When people finally live in 
space, I'm sure they will have hobbies like amateur radio.  In reality, 
this is a true statement today!  We have Amateur radio hobbyists living in 

IARU Region 4 (less than 250 or less than 500 miles from the earth).
IARU Region 5 (greater than 250 or 500 miles, etc...)

ARRL Section for space = SPA

"Submitted for your approval..."  Rod Serling

At 10:48 06/26/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>>In this case the
>>>International Space Station Alpha was running on pure solar power and they
>>>had 1 transmitter in the amateur radio bands running, for a category called
>>'Technically', ISS should probably have been Class 1B - Battery, rather 
>>than 1A, but
>>it's a bit late to get it correct, now.
>Hmm .. if the original source of the energy was the solar panels, which on 
>ISS is almost certain to be the case, I would think that would count as a 
>1A even if the energy was stored in the station's batteries for a 
>while.  I may very well be wrong on that, but I certainly would be 
>comfortable with calling ISS a 1A station.


Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org