Re: [sarex] UO-14 , FO-29, FO-20, QRM via ISS

[jeff w griffin <kb2wqm@xxxxxxxx>]

I agree with  Bruce , Tim,  and  Bob, there should be NO unattended
packet transmission's via ISS. The UO-14 interference is minor compared 
the possible damage to the FO bird's.  
Also....How about swapping the tx freqs for packet and voice? This would
cause the problem to go away. I don't see a problem with packet on
144.490. And, it's pretty hard to do an unattended voice contact!

73 Jeff kb2wqm


> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Bruce Paige wrote:
> 
> > the main problem is when a ham leaves his packet station on 24 
> hours a day  to try and connect to the iss. this is very
discourteous...<SNIP>

> I would go one step further and say that unattended packet 
> transmissions of any kind via ISS are not desired. 
> de WB4APR@amsat.org, Bob
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org