Re: [sarex] "NOCALL"

["Larry Faehling" <kl7ibv@xxxxxxxxx>]

A US callsign isn't appropriate, but a Russian one is?  What gives?
____________________________________________________________________________
_________
Larry, KL7IBV in Wisconsin
Bluemound 97 - CAP, USAFAUX
lfaehling@wiwg.cap.gov
Visit Larry's Cooking Links at:
http://www.frontiernet.net/~lfaehl/cooking.htm
Those who sacrifice freedom for a sense of security, deserve neither. -Ben
Franklin


----- Original Message -----
From: The Tate's <tates@tenforward.com>
To: <sarex@AMSAT.Org>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:53 PM
Subject: RE: [sarex] "NOCALL"


> Simply because the parameters on the TNC were lost before the TNC was
> powered back up. So far they haven't had a chance to reprogram it. And
since
> the ISS isn't "US" a Nxxxx call sign isn't appropriate.
>
> David Tate
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-SAREX@AMSAT.Org [mailto:owner-SAREX@AMSAT.Org]On Behalf Of
> > Matt Henderson
> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:08 PM
> > To: sarex@AMSAT.Org
> > Subject: [sarex] "NOCALL"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   WHy do they use N0CALL ??
> >
> >
> >   That seems pretty dumb to me
> >
> >    NA1SS would be much more appropriate
> >
>
> ----
> Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>

----
Via the sarex mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe sarex" to Majordomo@amsat.org