|
Like many another subscribers to the sarex-amsat
reflector I am nothing but
another "Joe Amateur". I participate in the hobby because I enjoy it and like to share it with others. If I understand NASA policy correctly, the
platform of Amateur Radio in space
is to provide some educational benefit to everyone. Please correct me if I am wrong. I would imagine that this is the intent of the ISS project also. I understand that getting consensus between many
countries is difficult
regarding the ISS project. The common sense approach to this would be, a
countries Amateur Radio interest
aboard ISS is directly proportional to the respective national funding contribution toward the ISS project itself. (Maybe not politically correct, but fair.) This mandate would have to come from NASA and the other Space Agencies. Regarding the AMSAT reflector text that has been
scrolling across my screen lately,
what is the purpose of all of this retoric? To drum up political support? Or, is it to divide and conquer? Or, both? These discussions should be carried out off-line
between the parties
involved and not posted on the AMSAT mailing list until a consensus between the feuding parties is resolved, and a mutual agreement is reached. The bottom line is that all parties that want to
see Amateur Radio become
an integral part of future space endeavours need to put their differences aside, work together and focus their resources on getting the job done, and not fighting over control of the projects themselves. Lets not let egos impede our success.
The alternative to resolving these differences
will be the 10E-13 mbar
nothingness of Deep Space for us terrestrial Hams. Respectfully yours,
Mike Connors KI7AB
|