[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Fw: ELK or ARROW



Bob K0NR (email list) wrote:
> amsat-bb-request@amsat.org wrote:
>> It seems improving the 2.4 dB of insertion loss of the diplexer would 
>> be a
>> better strategy (although not necessarily easy in the space 
>> available) than
>> attempting to modify what is very mechanically sound antenna.
>>
>> 73,
>> Joe kk0sd
>>
>>   
>
>    I am surprised that the duplexer/diplexer (take your pick) has that
>    much loss.
>    Has anyone verified this via a direct measurement (such as via a
>    network analyzer)?
>
>    Bob K0NR
I don't have a network analyzer handy, so I did an A/B test driving the 
Power Meter on my HP 8920A using a handheld radio.
At 435 MHz, the measured power with just a cable connection is 2.5 W. 
With the Arrow duplexor inserted, the power is 1.8 W.
This implies a loss of 10 log (1.8 /2.5) = -1.4 dB, more than I would 
have expected.

How accurate is this measurement? I dunno, probably no worse than 0.5 
dB. This deserves further investigation.

73, Bob K0NR
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home