[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Fw: ELK or ARROW

amsat-bb-request@amsat.org wrote:
> It seems improving the 2.4 dB of insertion loss of the diplexer would be a
> better strategy (although not necessarily easy in the space available) than
> attempting to modify what is very mechanically sound antenna.
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd

    I am surprised that the duplexer/diplexer (take your pick) has that
    much loss.
    Has anyone verified this via a direct measurement (such as via a
    network analyzer)?

    Bob K0NR

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb