[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: AO-51
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51
- From: "Alan Sieg WB5RMG" <wb5rmg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:44:31 -0600 (CST)
>> I would expect ...
> I may be misunderstanding your statement ...
I'm easily mis-understood. Like in my 'just-sent' reply - I said...
> The fact that you saw energy on that frequency, with doppler could
> fairly well rule out a ground-based signal on the 145 MHz uplink, reckon ?
Too few words failed to express what I thought I was thinking.
I'll try again.
The fact that you saw energy on that 435.xx, with doppler could
fairly well rule out a ground-based signal on 435.xx as the source of
interference to the AO-51 uplink. I think that is what you were confirming.
Maybe thats better. Maybe additional coffee may be required ..
/;^)
--
<- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
<- http://www.somenet.net * http://wb5rmg.somenet.net ->
<- http://www.linkedin.com/in/alansieg * My 'Day Job' ->
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home