[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: WB9L cross-satellite again



How about "an inadvertent QSO'??

73,Jeff WB2SYK


--- On Sun, 10/19/08, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:

> From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: WB9L cross-satellite again
> To: n3tl@bellsouth.net
> Cc: nigel@ngunn.net, jeffk13057@yahoo.com, sparkycivic@chaw.ca, AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
> Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 12:06 PM
> This is indeed a strange situation.
> 
> But in my mind a "QSO"  did not happen.
> 
> I don't know.
> 
> This is making my Brain Hurt.
> 
> Cross bird doesn't fit.  Cross bird I would say were if
> the output from 
> one bird went into another and got relayed.
> 
> Again My brain is hurting here.
> 
> >
> >WB9L is intentionally working AO-51, which is thousands
> of km away from and pretty much opposite AO-16, which N3TL
> is intentionally working. Indeed, both satellites have the
> same FM/VHF uplink. WB9L copies N3TL on AO-51 at 435.300
> +/-, in FM. N3TL copies WB9L on AO-16 at 437.026 +/-, in
> SSB. It seemed clear to me that a complete contact between
> these two stations occurred across both satellites.
> >
> >I'm open to any suggestions regarding a term more
> accurate than cross-satellite for such contacts.
> >
> >73 to all,
> >
> >Tim - N3TL
> >AMSAT Member No. 36820
> >Athens, Ga. - EM84ha
> >
> >
> >-------------- Original message from Nigel Gunn
> G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@ngunn.net>: -------------- 
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Jeffrey Koehler wrote: > Wouldn't it have to
> be, for true cross-satellite operation to occur, the 
> >>downlink of one satellite to be on the uplink of
> another? 
> >>
> >>Yes 
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________ 
> >>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are
> those of the author. 
> >>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur satellite program! 
> >>Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
> >>    
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are
> those of the author.
> >Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> >Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home