[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: SSTV Formats




Why not Robot 36 as originally suggested?  36 seconds per frame.  Not the greatest quality, but at least the pass is less likely to end in the middle of it.

Greg  KO6TH


----------------------------------------
> From: simon@hb9drv.ch
> To: ka1rrw@yahoo.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:22:55 +0200
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SSTV  Formats
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Go for Scottie 2 please - about one minute per picture, there's no need for 
> the longer Martin 1 / Scottie 1 format on VHF.
> 
> Simon Brown, HB9DRV
> www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "MM" 
> 
> 
>>
>> Hi all:
>> The current version of SpaceCam1 supports the following formats:
>>
>> Robot-36
>> Robot-72
>> Scottie S1
>> Scottie S2
>> Martin M1
>>
>> If there is enough public interest and support we can ask ARISS if they 
>> will approve SpaceCam2
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_________________________________________________________________
Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home