[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...
- From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:28:00 -0400
The moon is roughly 360,000 to 400,000 km away. By comparison, AO-40 had a
apogee of about 60,000km. At 2.4Ghz, that's about 16db difference each way.
Put AO-40 at the moon, and if I'm doing this right, you'd need about 32
times the ground station antenna both coming and going to get with a few db.
I'm gonna need a bigger rotor for sure! I'm sure smarter folks will check my
math....
73, Drew KO4MA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@mindspring.com>
Cc: "Trevor" <m5aka@yahoo.co.uk>; "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...
> what would a sample average link budget be?
>
> Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
>
>>As far as I can recall we are pursuing both Eagle and the P4 opportunity
>>equally, concentrating on common elements until the details are ironed
>>out. Neither has been identified as a primary or secondary objective.
>>
>>I agree a package on a lunar orbiter would be neat, but also that it is
>>not the best use of what volunteers we have. We need more folks to step up
>>to do things, AND we need to make better use of them when they do.
>>
>>73, Drew KO4MA
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Trevor" <m5aka@yahoo.co.uk>
>>To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:53 PM
>>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: NASA's American Student Moon Orbiter...
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- On Wed, 2/7/08, Dave hartzell <hartzell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=25839
>>>>http://asmo.arc.nasa.gov/
>>>>
>>>>Wouldn't it be fun to have a transponder on this! ;-)
>>>>
>>>Fun yes, but dare I say it, a waste of precious Volunteer resources.
>>>
>>>All lunar orbits are inherently unstable and will impact after a couple
>>>of years. The link budget requirements would not attract a mass user
>>>base.
>>>
>>>I suspect the number of Technically Capable volunteers is already being
>>>thinly stretched in trying to provide both the primary objective Phase-IV
>>>Lite (funded by Federal Government dollars) and the secondary objective
>>>the Eagle HEO.
>>>
>>>73 Trevor M5AKA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>>Not happy with your email address?.
>>>Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available
>>>now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>>program!
>>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home