[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: D-STAR experiment on Cubesat
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D-STAR experiment on Cubesat
- From: "Satoshi Yasuda" <7m3tjz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:10:25 +0900
Hi All,
> It is my understanding that it is simple a relabeled Icom radio. If
> it really weren't an issue for other manufacturers, one might
> reasonably ask why we aren't seeing D-Star radios from other
> manufacturers. Granted, there could be other reasons, but something
> is apparently keeping other manufacturers from building these radios.
> This means that essentially we are in a single source situation, where
> we can expect D-Star to remain fairly expensive. Indeed, the codec
> chip costs $20, but we see the price differential for these radios to
> be well over $100, even on an HT which is fairly expensive to begin
> with. That's a pretty high markup. (IC-91AD is $524, IC-91A is $408
> at universal radio). The UT-118 to do an upgrade is $189. The DV-
> Dongle is $200.
D-STAR radio needs not only the AMBE codec chip but also linear codec, GMSK
modem chip and control cpu. (see
http://d-star.dyndns.org/IC-2200H/IC-2200H052.jpg UT-115 is same as UT-118.)
So, I think D-STAR rig is over $100 higher than normal analog rig, (Analog
part of D-STAR rig is same as normal analog rig.)
Satoshi Yasuda 7m3tjz/ad6gz
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home