[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Shuttle question
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Shuttle question
- From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:59:20 +1000
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id;bh=xURezbRX0uCzmCdrOv3+ta0FGn1IoI8DmF4RT8nSP7I=;b=huvbp1ySZxt5iBbJsGqzHVcjfH3qM9YYxXMeQAJpbiqniWXRD7njPsqDUiSQxH/vQY6x5Mk2sJDV0NYGtDt8R1xeMlVODMaVPXsgSr/HaudjwkC6VqwHJN6OptpG2cJIvC0zlFfR44PSJ1PWA0pKoMUv6jAS10PUajFEwASGlaI=
At 12:15 AM 5/31/2008, Edward Cole wrote:
>Once you total the costs it may actually be cheaper to build a new
>satellite and launch it!
>Back the effort for P3E and Eagle/P4.
That too, yes, a new bird would be the easiest approach
indeed. Still, as I said, it was interesting contemplating how such
a recovery might be achieved with today's technology. :)
73 de VK3JED
http://vkradio.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home