[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Ridge Test Results




Hi Nathaniel,

Been watching this thread.  The only bits of info I haven't seen go across 
yet --

Antennas act very differently when the radiator part of the antenna is in 
close proximity to the RF ground.  If you have modelled the antenna as 
being "in empty space", that will account for much of the loss seen when it 
is mounted to the sat, which in your design by definition is very close to 
the sat frame, and thus both the electrical and RF grounds.  Have your 
modeller check to see if they have the sat frame, and any conductive 
panels, in their model; if not you'll have some (possibly large) matching 
adjustments to do.

A 1/4 wave piece of steel measuring tape needs to be at 90 degrees from all 
nearby metal to be an actual "monopole" antenna.  If you lay it along the 
side of the sat, the nearby metal (grounds) will soak up much of the signal.

If I remember right, Prof Campbell's prior-to-CubeSat project (name is 
escaping me at the moment) incorporated a proven loop design.  I don't 
remember the freq though.  You might want to check your spec against that one.

If you haven't already, check the entire assembly (antenna on sat) with an 
SWR analyzer, or preferably a network analyzer, to make sure the 
transmitter is "seeing" a 50 ohm RF load at the input of the antenna line 
at your transmit freq.  While this doesn't guarantee the antenna is 
actually an antenna and not a resistor, it does give a basic check that the 
matching network is close for your situation.

GL, Mike N2VR

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home