[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Best HT's for sats?
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Best HT's for sats?
- From: "Andrew Koenig" <andrewkoenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:16:19 -0500
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;bh=h0NSXFAfaiwxiJfGPzL3oCQ76z5FFg0aDDMUG4Kp79I=;b=e9DHpdCL7tk3TaXb4zmkJkOCqZR4KYeevmwlrzfF9FTrlUKmD1h+6IaGrE7utGK9cB5cizaIZFVPH10Xa4UQvg0OUS4Dx/KSfLuX6Pi7fE4n8nX07GQOn+vQ4tAvKi9JvnSVXNK6ftmqVQQ+Xr/pr1CjVjD+Z8gTK01zFxdGoDM=
I do the same thing with my 2 FT-60's in full duplex (I just got it working
tonight). I have a pair of headphones and my iPod with the iTalk module to
record all of the contacts I make. I find it a lot easier to do that then
trying to scribble calls as I go.
Bill, if you're looking for a full duplex radio, I don't really have many
suggestions, but you mentioned having a VX-2. The VX-2 has a VERY nice
receiver, so with the VX-2 for RX and a FT-60 for TX I think it'd work out
pretty nice for you.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Mark Vandewettering <
mvandewettering@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
> > I've made many sat contacts with my VX-2R but am
> > thinking about upgrading to something with 5 watts
> > output. I used a borrowed IC-W32A and Swan Island and
> > it worked fine, although I could not hear my downlink
> > in full duplex mode, too much desensing. Not sure
> > full duplex is even worth the extra money, as it seems
> > that most duplex HTs have a similar desensing problem.
> >
> > I was thinking about trading in the VX-2R for an FT-60
> > or a VX-6R, any comments on these or other
> > sat-friendly HTs?
> >
> > 73, Bill NZ5N
>
> I've been using a TH-D7A and an Arrow antenna. Works
> great, no problem with desense, and it's fun to use
> the APRS stuff to bounce packets off ISS, Go-32 and NO-44.
> It's not the most glamorous, but it works very well for
> satellites, and I have no hesitation in recommending it
> for that.
>
> I find the full-duplex to be really useful. I put a
> splitter on the sound output, and run half to some
> cheap earbuds and the other to a voice recorder. That
> way, I can record both my voice and others without
> difficulty. Scan back through my blog @ http://brainwagon.org
> for example mp3s.
>
> Mark KF6KYI
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of
> > Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
> > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> > author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
73's
Andrew K.
KE5GDB
http://www.thathamkid.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home