[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: More AO-7 log.




Rgr Roger,
                You're most probably right. Never mind. At least I tried.

I used to rectify the mistakes but it was getting to be a full time job.

I'll let somebody else have a bash now.

73 John.   <la2qaa@amsat.org>
..........................................................................................

> From: rogerkola@aol.com
> To: la2qaa@amsat.org; sv1bsx@yahoo.gr
> CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org; eu-amsat@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb]  More AO-7 log.
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 07:57:20 -0500
> 
> These people may not subscribe to the amsat list...you may be preaching to
> the choir...
> 
> Roger
> WA1KAT
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Hackett" <archie.hackett@hotmail.com>
> To: <sv1bsx@yahoo.gr>
> Cc: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>; "Eu-amsat@yahoogroups.com"
> <eu-amsat@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:17 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] More AO-7 log.
> 
> 
> >
> > Mak,
> >        Despite our repeated requests ... yesterday ...
> >
> > W7AIT 15:49
> > W7AIT 15:50 ... (seperate QSO's)
> > PY4AJ CQ
> > VK4ZQ CQ
> >
> > Like I mentioned ... don't these people 'look' at what they write? ... or
> note how those that fill in the log correctly do it? ... or even read the
> Amsat mail?.
> >
> > What can one do?.
> >
> > Statistics are no use to man nor beast if they're incorrect - and over the
> first 3 months of this year there are enough errors to ensure that the
> statistics *ARE* wrong ... agreed, they're only small mistakes and agreed
> that - "it's only a hobby" - but what is the point in filling in the log in
> the first place if you're not going to do it correctly?.
> >
> > Having pointed out the errors once, twice and three times on both bulletin
> boards in the last 14 days I assumed that ought to be enough - obviously it
> wasn't ... so I don't know about you but I'm not going to bother anymore.
> >
> > Since the main "contenders" are English speaking one cannot blame the
> language. The panes are clear enough and cannot be misconscrued. The hour
> glass is self explanitory - you yourself have explained more than once how
> to fix things if they do occasionally go amok - (data is "data") - I'm
> referring to the - 'remember me' - checkbox issue.
> >
> > It's a pity such a useful resource is allowed to become a mess.
> >
> > EOR ... (End of rant).
> >
> > 73 John.   <la2qaa@amsat.org>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> 
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home