[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Video of indoor, ultra-cheap cubesat operations
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Video of indoor, ultra-cheap cubesat operations
- From: "Bruce Robertson" <ve9qrp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:07:35 -0400
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;bh=vFWcdW9YfCBn2gRyT7GJOWcj9hwEuDlQk6BiVupDe78=;b=qtZvsuRSnqG559ShfqrwS5SfoNF6Xd11DjveQlbvJUNkwjNkmmoJr1AdtX1FZe1X6r9qINTldEKBE4n35rc3oT9FiwocHqQGCnNXDtHZTAWITnd3/NAMEJ3LRab4qIuUgnRlmM33Z8PrjsiBeTU0Ttsu2nlaFiYryXCb7n7j1xw=
Continuing this series of observations, using very simple antennas
indoors with my FT-817:
I worked on a eastward 5 deg. max elevation pass of XI-V, or CO-58,
this evening. This cubesat has a nominal output of 80mW. Its periodic
transmission makes it less ideal than CO-55 for this sort of
experimentation, but the break between transmissions is not as long as
LO-19's: in my experience with this low pass it never doppler-shifted
out of the 500 Hz filter while silent. I had to have only the exterior
wall between me and the bird for it to be reliably heard.
If I've done the math right, this is a free-space path loss of about
153 dB on a, roughly, +20 dBm signal, meaning that the receiver can
hear down to at least -133 dBm at 500 Hz bandwidth (since we haven't
factored in the losses due to the indoor reception).
A dipole mounted directly on a BNC copied VO-52's 2m downlink quite
well for a couple of minutes, both from the second storey of our home
and from the first. By the time I found my video camera, there was
apparently no activity. Possibly the dipole's pattern got in the way
of reception.
I would be very interested to hear if anyone else has had success with
similar minimal equipment. I hope to take this setup to a more urban
environment and see if it will still work, say, outdoors.
73, Bruce
VE9QRP
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home