[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: EXTREMELY LONG (was Re: Re: Robert Mcqwier)

At 01:48 PM 12/15/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:

>Folks. I do not need a defense (if any of this was meant as one)

Bob, I read the WHOLE darn post and it brought back many fine 
memories of our 20+ year friendship.

I was going to send you an email to tell you that I had your back but 
then realized you were doing just fine ...

I feel fortunate to be your friend, to be able to call you and start 
the conversation with an insult about your social skills (or rather 
the lack thereof) and have you say "I deserved that" and then have 
the conversation move right on ... "I love ya man!"

I know you would have preferred to just take the body-blows and move 
on, but thank you for taking the time to post a real hard-look at the 
state of the hobby. Since I came back to the TAPR BoD, I have shared 
the concerns of both of our boards about the greying of our hobby. 
When you hear that the average age is 58 or so and is rising at the 
rate of 1 yr. per yr., you really have to get a chill running down 
your spine. We DO need to do things to attract NEW people (read 
YOUNGER) or there will be no one to attend the wake for ham radio 
when this hobby dies.

Thanks for letting me sit in on the "jam sessions" with Matt Ettus. I 
can state from first-hand observation that Bob and Matt went back and 
forth with calculations that would normally be done on napkins and 
did them in their heads, and then could EXPLAIN them to me! Now that 
is a test of a plan or theory - to be able to explain it in terms 
that non-engineers can follow. I'm a physician by training, consider 
myself fairly literate and diversely self-educated, but I can feel a 
bit intimidated during some of these discussions. However, NEVER, and 
I repeat, NEVER has Bob, Matt, Tom Clark, Rick Hambly, or TAPR's 
cadre of geniuses, or anyone else I consider a technical whiz-kid 
(sorry, I wouldn't mean to insult anyone by leaving you out) ever 
been impatient with me for asking what must surely be a very 
fundamental question; in fact, it is not unusual for them to stop, 
explain things to me in terms I can understand, bring me up to speed, 
and then resume the conversation.

I am very sorry that some folks have had their feelings hurt along 
the way, but I try to remember what Phil Karn use to utter A LOT - 
"never ascribe to malice what can better be ascribed to stupidity" 
but in this case, rather than stupidity, it would be a lack of 
awareness of how some folks are really feeling.

I make snap decisions every day as an emergency physician, and if I 
don't, people die. And sometimes, no decision is worse than the 
"wrong" decision. But decisions are necessary. And at the end of the 
day, you hope and pray that most of the ones you made are correct.

We need to face the fact that the world is changing, demographics are 
changing, and WE need to change. I am confident that we are hitching 
our wagons to the right horses and that this BoD DOES have a vision 
we can work towards. That is not to say that great ideas should not 
and will not come from elsewhere, but there should be civility and 
fraternalism and respect of the different positions.

And Bob, you won't be surprised to hear that some folks get mad at 
TAPR because we are not pushing Packet as our main thrust anymore. 
Tradition is important, and a realistic view of history is necessary 
to appreciate where you've been and where you need to go, but the 
past should not anchor you so firmly that you cannot move forward ...

"Ad astra" ....

Proud to be your friend,

Dave  VE3GYQ/W8
Spencerville, OH

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb