[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle
- From: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:34:12 -0500
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;bh=23Hdxv0fnmTobEWfkq0IsiTSk32uPKA8bvtm5n3ZcMk=;b=YXS81CyX93eyXpWwh9sl1xWjYIGlbsn+hgtWzPfrmaxGEao14WiLbLLy1JlDI/UwFf50zvYgxA/po3jBHqCILjPVH/nSR4Upav7+ruP5+crujzTETGBGo/0jR2vcQ6A/X3Tn130cMRiV+rV+WoXO4iC9XC8PUSm7d+xu9KlFwt4=
kc6uqh wrote:
> The 2M /70cm is not the best choice on a satellite 23,000 miles away. 2M
> suffers from galatic noise, 70cm is siginificantly better. 1 to 2 GHz is
> considered optimum for SETTI work. Best choice is 902-928 up and 1.2 GHz
> down. Next best choice is 2.4 GHz or 70cm up for satellites not centered
> over North America.
> P4 will bring us, no Doppler, no tracking, no spin rotation, fixed dishes.
> Something we have yet to experience in satellite communications.
> It has my vote if I have one.
>
> Art, KC6UQH
>
You always do. Vote in the director elections. You get three or four
votes.
Bob
--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
“An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why
must the pessimist always run to blow it out?” Descartes
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home