[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: One satellite or many?




a good hf station costs more than many satellite stations.
V band and U band are common low freq sat bands. what is lower that those?
yes to work satellites the operator needs to learn a lot more than 
working a FM repeater on a hilltop.
more than one satellite at $6,000,000 each, how many do you want to fund?
Eagle is not a tech challenge, except perhaps the higher freq digital part.
the host satellite decides where our antennas go. they will likely 
need to be omni-directional to be of any use to use?
P4 sounds like the simplest and easiest to use ham satellite that has 
ever been thought about or built. Both for the builders and the users.

Les W4SCO

At 08:22 PM 12/14/2007, you wrote:
>Greetings from Patrick N2OEQ
>
>Sorry to see so much disagreement over future satellites.
>
>Echo came close to the right idea for amsat. It was advertised as a 
>high power satellite anyone with a home station could use.
>Thats why I joined up and made a meager donation towards the launch.
>
>If amsat thought outside the membership box and designed and built 
>for great numbers of people, more people would donate and join!
>
>Instead, amsat makes it hard with uncommon operating bands and 
>greater hardware requirements.
>
>If I can be constructive, amsat should design for simplicity of 
>operation more than one satellite.
>
>Eagle would be good for those who insist on a technical challenge. 
>P4 Payload should be designed for universal simplicity.
>Why not have both!
>
>Regarding the coverage afforded by P4, may I suggest the lowest 
>frequency possible with gain dual band directional antennas deployed 
>to the sides after launch much like P3E. That should provide 
>semi-spherical coverage of the earth or about half the globe.
>
>On another note, last august I corresponded with NOAA suggesting or 
>asking if they could add an amateur payload to one of their 
>satellites as they are a prolific satellite builder. The idea was 
>forwarded to others there so keep your hopes up for another 
>possibility. It seemed plausible since noaa nws has an existing 
>relationship with amateurs regarding weather conditions.
>
>Think in terms of expanding the satellite hobby, not making it a 
>small exclusive aspect of the hobby.
>
>Go P4!!!  I was psyched when I heard about it.  Good YOB men ( and women )
>
>Take care all, pat
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home