[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle



I think the BOD is serious. Otherwise, I wouldn't be sitting here right now 
working on the Eagle U-band receiver.

73,

John
KD6OZH

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" <vlfiscus@mcn.net>
To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 18:08 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle


> At 04:21 PM 12/11/07 -0800, n2oeq@aceweb.com wrote:
>>Merry Christmas to all my fellow space enthusiasts
>>
>>Nice to see some informative Big Picture discussion here.
>>
>>For all its worth;  I believe a cooperative effort with an
>>established  satellite builder incorporating an auxilliary payload makes
>>more sense than an independant effort with more complexity and cost.
>>
>>Who really would'nt want a geosynchronise transponder?
>
>
> I want to see NA put Eagle in orbit before anything else. They already put
> Eagle on the back burner once to build a grid-sat.
>
> Looks like waiting to see if the BOD was really serious about doing Eagle
> before I'd be making any donations to it turned out to be a good decision.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home