[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Bob's Message

>At 08:54 PM 12/11/07 -0500, "Rick Hambly \(W2GPS\)" <w2gps@cnssys.com> wrote:
> >Trevor,
> >
> >The Intelsat opportunity is just that, an opportunity. It's not a sure thing
> >so the Eagle project will be the backup.
>Like how the BOD put Eagle on the back burner and instead built Echo so
>people could pass more Grids?

The reason for Echo (a two-user FM voice) escapes me also, Greg.

To me, money down the tubes...

When I fought it to begin with, one of the reasons given was to 
increase membership quickly to increase contributions....I have never 
seen proof of either increase since.

Profit motives??  I'm sure it sold a bunch of 2 M handhelds.
Increase interest in ham satellite radio??  I doubt it, it has the 
same degree of difficulty as a cell phone....Can't imagine that weak 
challenge would hold anyone's interest for long, or induce them to 
contribute to a HEO.

There was obviously a reason to go the Echo route, but that reason 
still escapes me...

Another Oscar 7 or 8 would have been infinitely better...But I was 
told, prior to building of Echo, at several conventions, that my 
opinion had not been requested, by several powers that were and still are...

But I am still a member and still have a vote!!!

            73, Dave, WB6LLO

                    Disagree: I learn....

               Pulling for P3E... 

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb