[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle
- From: Tony Langdon <vk3jed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:06:56 +1100
At 11:21 AM 12/12/2007, Patrick McGrane wrote:
>Merry Christmas to all my fellow space enthusiasts
>
>Nice to see some informative Big Picture discussion here.
>
>For all its worth; I believe a cooperative effort with an
>established satellite builder incorporating an auxilliary payload
>makes more sense than an independant effort with more complexity and cost.
Agreed, more efficient use of resources.
>Who really would'nt want a geosynchronise transponder?
One? Probably not (odds are it would be parked over the Atlantic, a
useless location from here). 2 or 3? Definitely (global coverage,
except near the poles).
73 de VK3JED
http://vkradio.com
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home