[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Phase 4 versus Eagle

At 11:21 AM 12/12/2007, Patrick McGrane wrote:
>Merry Christmas to all my fellow space enthusiasts
>Nice to see some informative Big Picture discussion here.
>For all its worth;  I believe a cooperative effort with an 
>established  satellite builder incorporating an auxilliary payload 
>makes more sense than an independant effort with more complexity and cost.

Agreed, more efficient use of resources.

>Who really would'nt want a geosynchronise transponder?

One?  Probably not (odds are it would be parked over the Atlantic, a 
useless location from here).  2 or 3?  Definitely (global coverage, 
except near the poles).

73 de VK3JED

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb