[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Terrestrial repeater interference to AO-27

I'll let Riley know that it has moved, although he'll still probably want to 
get in touch with the licensee, as his information in ULS is out-of-date... 
I tried to send him a letter, and it came back as undeliverable, and Riley 
was also unable to come up with a valid address.

George, KA3HSW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@mindspring.com>
To: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Terrestrial repeater interference to AO-27

>I talked to one of the control ops via Echolink a few weeks ago and he said 
>it had been moved. I can't verify it. It was a simplex echolink link into a 
>repeater. There were actually two of them, one on 145.850, and the other on 
> I didn't know anyone else was working on this. Had he not said they had 
> been moved Riley was going to be my next call! Thanks for your efforts.
> This sort of thing is one of the reasons we shouldn't use CTCSS on 
> satellite uplinks unless we have to....
> 73, Drew KO4MA

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb