[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Status of Cute 1.7 ?
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Status of Cute 1.7 ?
- From: "Zachary Schrempp" <zach.km7i@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:49:40 -0700
- DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;b=cpRHKpjBdoVzQ3kXLzspw6n1S0o3+wsbHr8+jndQRrsyRYtrcwportUGLTIsoOy3vI6bMdB/MIqiAEpre5mV7mEt2U1wXUQ8dvzrTUZqWygp9CmkpK0eZaBl/YbzDVqEOC9qWgJZz9S94i1oWGJJx5gYz7e8NE3QpbM5vBP/lcc=
My understanding is that Cute 1.7 is uncontrollable but has enough
power to keep the transmitter sending a carrier all the time. Maybe
someone else can clarify.
Zach KM7I
On 4/26/07, john heath <g7hia@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> listened for Cute 1.7 on the 21:30 pass in range IO92
> Just a strong carrier on the expected frequency. Lots of Doppler shift. Signal dissapeared at the predicted LOS.
>
> Is cute 1.7 in trouble?
>
> 73 John G7HIA
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home