[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Government control hasexceededconstitutionallimitations.
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Government control hasexceededconstitutionallimitations.
- From: "Roger Kolakowski" <rogerkola@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:41:23 -0300
In Boston, we have been restricted to 50W output from our repeaters on 440
for 10 years. By complying with this restriction I believe we have been a
"courteous guest."
Roger
WA1KAT
----- Original Message -----
From: "jmfranke" <jmfranke@cox.net>
To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 5:52 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Government control has
exceededconstitutionallimitations.
> I for one am happy the government allows us to be a guest on this band and
I
> always strive to be a courteous guest. I do not want to impose costs and
> limitations to their system(s). The government has clearly stated what
they
> consider to be acceptable behavior, which is not onerous. Surely the
> amateur community can operate effectively with these restrictions.
>
> Nor do I want to be kicked out because of rude behavior from others. I am
> glad the ARRL is trying to present a good face for the amateur radio
> community. In the past, the government has provided us with free
launches,
> still provides orbital elements, and has protected this band from
commercial
> incursions. I want friendly relations to be maintained and do not like
the
> in your face attitude of many amateur radio operators.
>
> The government has more systems in this band. As a former radar operator
on
> US Navy E-2 Hawkeye aircraft, I often saw amateur transmissions, including
> ATV, on the radar which operates in the 70cm band. In most cases, I
merely
> changed channels up or down in frequency to avoid any mutual interference.
> The Navy also has shipboard radars in this band, SPS-40, etc.
>
> The PAVE PAWS serves many task masters including the tracking of
satellites
> and spacecraft.
>
> While the PAVE PAWS radars are capable of narrow beam widths, they are
still
> susceptible to interference from signals entering the antenna sidelobes.
> Any reduction in sensitivity or function is a cost to us all.
>
>
>
> John WA4WDL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home