[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: VQlog and LoTW




For myself I use eQSL and have tried LOTW once or twice. LOTW in my 
opinion is not user friendly.

Les

At 05:07 PM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
>Quoting sco@sco-inc.com:
>
> >
> > LW4.5 exports ADIF logs that eQSL is ok with. We are working on a new
> > scoQSL program for uploading logs to eQSL and LOTW.
> >
> > Les W4SCO
> > www.logwindow.com
> > www.myweblinks.cc
> >
> >
> > At 03:34 PM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
> > >All,
> > >I'm considering moving my VHF/Sat logs to VQlog, because DX4WIN
> > >isn't really built for the oddities of sat logging.  Especially the
> > >super-oddities of satellites and LoTW.
> > >Can anyone tell me if VQLog generates an ADIF log for satellite QSOs
> > >that LoTW likes, without any user post-processing?  Right now I have
> > >to hand-edit DX4WIN output to include things like satellite name etc.
> > >Thanks,
> > >--
> > >Scott Townley NX7U
> > >Gilbert, AZ  DM43di
>
>I use VQlog and LoTW for satellite contacts, and yes, in general, they get
>along nicely. I'm disappointed in the number of satellite QSLs generated by
>LoTW, though. It seems the AMSAT community isn't too keen on LoTW yet.
>
>73, VE9QRP



_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home