[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: ALuminum Rod
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ALuminum Rod
- From: Sil - ZL2CIA <zl2cia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:55:01 +1200
GEORGE ABBOTT wrote:
> Hi: Can brass rods be used for antenna elements? Regards ,George Abbott
> Ka1ajf
George,
Yes and no. I have made antennas from brass rod and they worked just
fine, but would probably have worked a little better if they had been
made from aluminium (aluminum).
Brass rod is a nice material to work with. It's rigid and can be easily
soldered. However, the resistivity of brass is higher than aluminium and
the I squared R losses are higher. A little more of your Tx energy is
wasted warming your antenna if it is made from brass than would be if it
was made from aluminium. Most antenna manuals recommend against brass
because of this, although I'm not sure how "real" this loss is.
Intriguingly, one our our club members built himself a Q meter, and
demonstrated it at a club meeting by measuring the Q of loops of wire
from different materials. While brass did less well than than aluminium
or copper, galvanised iron wire was significantly better than brass.
This was surprising because zinc is generally considered to have a
resistivity only slightly less than brass. I built some antennas using
heavy galvanised fencing wire, based on the results of this test. They
were not a fantastic success.
If you already have the brass rod, then go ahead and experiment.
Radio data Reference Book: G. R. Jessop
Relative resistance
Copper 1
Aluminium 1.64
Zinc 3.4
Brass 3.9
ARRL Handbook 1992
Resistivity compared to copper (same as relative resistance)
Copper 1
Aluminum 1.6
Zinc 3.4
Brass 3.7 to 4.9
Sil
ZL2CIA
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home