[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Full duplex.



I also agree with Howard

73" de

i8CVS Domenico

----- Original Message -----
From: "john hackett" <la2qaa@hotmail.com>
To: <Amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Cc: <allan_gm1sxx@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:46 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Full duplex.


> I agree with Howard.
>
> 73 John.   <la2qaa@amsat.org>
>
............................................................................
.............................
>
> Hi Robert
>
> >http://www.wku.edu/ksgc/sats.pdf
> >
> >This is great stuff and would be a good link (or download) to add to the
> >AMSAT webpage for newbies (like me!)
>
> I agree it is especially clear and well written. My only caveat is that I
> personally feel that the rejection of full duplex capability in the paper
> promotes blind transmission for longer periods than necessary creating QRM
> for others. Thinking back to when I cut my teeth, I would have found it
> particularly frustrating not knowing if I was making it.
>
> Just my opinion, and the author is to be applauded for his efforts.
>
> 73, Howard G6LVB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home