[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: ISS Not A Satellite WAS: Satellites and the LoTW
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS Not A Satellite WAS: Satellites and the LoTW
- From: Eric Christensen <kf4otn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:55:09 -0500
- OpenPGP: id=40C620DC
Oh I like that idea. It should be its own DXCC entity AND it should
have an IOTA number as well.
Eric KF4OTN
Cathryn Mataga wrote:
> Eric Christensen wrote:
>> Roger,
>> I believe there is a misconception here. Whatever your opinion about
>> the ISS, I believe the AMSAT Board has felt made a distinction.
>>
>> When talking to the astronauts on the ISS you aren't making a satellite
>> contact. It is a LOS (line of sight) contact. When you make a contact
>> with someone else on the ground VIA the ISS then it is a satellite
>> contact.
>>
>> I am trying to get the ARRL to recognize the ISS as a satellite when
>> contacts are made VIA their gear not when you make a contact with the ISS.
>>
>
> ARRL should recognize the ISS as a country. That would
> stir up the pot. If Scarborough reef is a country, then why can't
> the ISS be a country?
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home