[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Lanrangian points
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Lanrangian points
- From: "Marc Vermeersch" <amvm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:38:49 +0100
- The Lagrangian points L1, L2, L3 are not stable. A satellite positioned
there would require constant positions corrections: complex satellite. L4
and L5 are stable.
- When n L points are populated and you want to populate another L point,
you have to solve an (n+2)-body problem. This becomes extremely complex.
- L4 and L5 are about the same distance from Earth as the moon: EME type
complications for communications.
http://www.physics.montana.edu/faculty/cornish/lagrange.pdf
http://www.physics.montana.edu/faculty/cornish/lagrange.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMM17XJD1E_index_0.html
-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of w7lrd@comcast.net
Sent: January 12, 2007 08:07
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Lanrangian points
Hello Amsat'ers
Is it possible or practical to have a communications satellite at the L1 or
L2 points.
73 Bob W7LRD
Seattle
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home