[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Crossbooms ... my pennyworth.



This has been discussed many times over the years and I still don't
see why. I have been using a 10 piece of thick wall metal pipe since
1992 and never seen any problem. I have my 2 meter and 70 cm cross
yagis on the ends so the pipe  passes only heavy way and it works
great. Since I worked AO-10 and AO-13 and later AO-40 at 30,000km I
assume the metal boom is working just fine. I used the same setup  at
K4CQ for fieldday this past summer and came in 3rd over all. I guess
folks should use what they are comfortable with. My point is it ain't
that big a deal.

That is my 2 cent worth.

73's << John

On 1/10/07, Bruce Robertson <broberts@mta.ca> wrote:
> Quoting Howard Long <howard@howardlong.com>:
>
> [snip]
> > could ever get a great match, particularly on 70cm. So I resorted to
> > making
> > circular polarisation work with the 2m and 70cm planes separated, and
> > remote
> > preamps and remote polarisation switches.
> >
> > This worked _very_ well, and the gain you achieve by being able to
> > manually
> > switch polarisation during a null when working LEO's cannot be over
> > emphasised IMHO.
> >
> > One final point, radio amateurs have been doing antenna diversity for a
> > very
> > long time.
> >
> > 73, Howard G6LVB
> >
>
> A contribution to the original discussion, plus a question:
>
> I believe it was on this list that I read of an alternative to fiberglass
> booms (of which there are none in my local sales area). My new 10' boom
> comprises sched. 40 conduit with an snug-fitting 8' length of doweling
> placed inside. Others have removed any 'play' between the doweling and the
> conduit by spraying expanding foam inside the ends of the conduit. I
> suppose one should cap the ends, too. The total cost of this for me was CAN
> $20. The antennas, rotors and mast are on sawhorses now, but as far as I
> can see the conduit-dowel boom has an appropriate stiffness.
>
>
> Now my question:
> Howard mentioned the much-documented advantages of polarization switching
> for LEO satellite work. In this same context, is it worth the additional
> work to include the remote logic required for V and H polarizations along
> with RHCP and LHCP?
>
> 73, Bruce VE9QRP
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


-- 
N4QWF Amateur Radio Operator       >>
AO-7,FO-29,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52,ISS >>
Internet N4QWF@AMSAT.ORG         >>
Formerly KC4AHW  VK3FEZ             >>
Amsat Member #27845                     >>
DXCC #33,478                                  >>
VUCC SAT #135                               >>
WAS SAT #296                                >>
51 on 51 #013                                  >>
LON -79.25 LAT 37.45 Grid FM07      >>
>From the Foothills of the Blueridge     >>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home