• Subject: [amsat-bb] Linear link budgets
• From: Grant Hodgson <grant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:35:25 +0000

```Unfortunately, the calculations for dividing transponder power equally
amongst users are not as simple as have been suggested.

For the 400mW case :- assume that 400mW is the maximum power that the
transmitter can produce.  Then a single CW signal could in theory be
sent at a power of 400mW, assuming no AGC, beacons etc.

However, if 2 equal level CW signals were being transmitted, then the
Peak Envelope Power of these 2 signals would be 6dB higher than each of
the signals individually.  This is because the voltages of each of the 2
CW signals have to be added together, giving a peak signal with double
the voltage of each signal, which is 4 times the power or a 6dB increase.

Therefore, to keep within the 400mW limit, each CW signal would be
restricted to 100mW each.  The same analysis can be done for 3 equal CW
signals, where each would be 9.5dB down; i.e. 44mW each etc.

For SSB signals, the same analysis can be performed by simply taking the
PEP of each SSB signal; so one CW signal could co-exist with one SSB
signal, both of which would have a downlink power of 100mW.

The above is actually a slight over-simplification, as it takes no
account for compression etc, but serves as a useful example.

As Graham mentions, a beacon may be present at a much higher level than
the rest of the transponder, which makes the analysis slightly more
complex, but the principle remains :-

It's the PEAK power that limits the RF performance of linear
transmitters, and that is valid for all linear transmitters.

regards

Grant  G8UBN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

```

AMSAT Home