[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Lunar Architecture Moon Base
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Lunar Architecture Moon Base
- From: Nate Duehr <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 01:56:45 -0700
James R Miller wrote:
> On Dec 04, Pat, KA9SCF wrote:
>
>> With the amount of libration on the moon, what's the maximum antenna gain
>> per band that you can get before it becomes too much of an issue.
>
> http://www.amsat.org/amsat/articles/g3ruh/110.html
>
> Perhaps this should be in the Amsat FAQ =%-)
>
> 73 de James G3RUH
Perhaps with all the "noise" (pun intended) here recently about
unlicensed transmitters on 2.4 GHz... the following line from the article:
"For a given TX e.i.r.p., signal strength received at Earth depends only
on the mechanical size of the RX antenna; frequency is irrelevant [1].
Noise level however is not, and S-band (2.4 GHz) is a sensible downlink
choice because very low noise performance is robustly obtainable "off
the shelf"."
Is more controversial than it once was? :-)
Or maybe not. Depends on who's arguments one liked during the recent
2.4 GHz debate on the mailing list.
The above comments notwithstanding, nice article James. Thanks for
sharing the link. I learned something from reading it, and that's
always a Good Thing.
Nate WY0X
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home