[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Why do the amsats get more and more complex?
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Why do the amsats get more and more complex?
- From: "David B. Toth" <ve3gyq@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:50:00 -0400
At 11:29 PM 9/19/2006, sco@sco-inc.com wrote:
>Maybe someone can explain why Eagle could not use the L Band for its
>digital uplink instead of S Band? Then you would have a L/C mode and
>many users already have a L band uplink capability.
My understanding is that there is not enough room for an antenna of
the size required for 1296, at least not one with much gain.
I'm sure that someone from the engineering team could speak further to this.
This was heavily discussed each night at the DCC in Tucson, and
antennas and band availability were discussed ad nauseam.
No one is trying to ignore the users - heck, why build it if there
would be no users, but they WERE trying to make sound engineering
arguments so that there would actually be something worthwhile
available. One AMSAT member present, someone who I recognized as an
operator with some experience, made a number of suggestions that the
engineers seemed to embrace, so you may see some additional info come
forward by the time of the AMSAT meeting.
Dave VE3GYQ/W8
Spencerville, OH
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home