[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: 50 MHz (was S band and Eagle: an appeal for ahigherleveldiscussion)



Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
> Trevor, M5AKA asked
>
>   
>> What are peoples views on trying to get an Amateur Satellite Service allocation
>> at 50-51 MHz ? 
>>     
>
>   
-- snip ---
> Personally, if we were going to fight a battle, I'd rather see us fight
> for an S2 = 3400-3410 MHz allocation in R1.
>   

Yes indeed.  I would love to see the Europeans specifically talk the 
French into dropping their opposition to our use of 3400-3410 MHz as an 
uplink.

> 73, Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home