[amsat-bb] Re: 50 MHz (was S band and Eagle: an appeal for ahigherleveldiscussion)

["Ransom, Kenneth G. \(JSC-OC\)[BAR]" <kenneth.g.ransom@xxxxxxxx>]

Would the allocation be for Uplink only? 


Kenneth - N5VHO

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Trevor
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:24 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] 50 MHz (was S band and Eagle: an appeal for a
higherleveldiscussion)

--- Robert Bruninga <bruninga@usna.edu> wrote:
> Lets preserve 2m downlinks for OMNI directional downlinks to Mobiles 
> and handhelds where the 19" mobile whip OMNI has a 9 dB  advantage 
> over 70cm and a 24 dB advantage over 2.4 GHz.
> 
> We can easily close the link to mobiles and handhelds with Omni 
> antennas with 2 meter downlinks from space.  I hope we Continue to 
> develop this mobile satellite capability.
> PCSAT and ARISS packet system demonstrate this easily.

Bob raises a good point here.

What are peoples views on trying to get an Amateur Satellite Service
allocation at 50-51 MHz ? 

Granted omni antennas would be 3 times bigger than 2 metres but we would
benefit from low path loss and low doppler shift ?

73 Trevor M5AKA



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and
ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb