[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3



Sorry. It's truncated...I have it now!

Roger

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Kolakowski" <rogerkola@aol.com>
To: "Alan Thoren" <alan.thoren@mts.net>; "'Emily Clarke'"
<emily@clarke-design.com>; "'John B. Stephensen'" <kd6ozh@comcast.net>;
<amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 9:06 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3


> Hi Alan...
>
> That folder does not contain that file...maybe it's another filename?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Roger
> WA1KAT
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alan Thoren" <alan.thoren@mts.net>
> To: "'Emily Clarke'" <emily@clarke-design.com>; "'John B. Stephensen'"
> <kd6ozh@comcast.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 5:11 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
>
>
> > Here's a colour ( or color ) coded Radio Spectrum Allocation chart in
PDF
> > format of a 2'x3' poster that just about every Canadian amateur has
posted
> > in their shack.
> >
> >
>
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/spectallocation.
> > pdf/$FILE/spectallocation.pdf
> >
> > The olive color is amateur and the olive with dots is amateur shared.
> >
> > |The detailed chart (
> > |http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/Chp04Chart.pdf  - starting on page
> > |50) is a bit fuzzy but it looks like amateur is allocated from 2300 -
> 2450,
> > albeit all on a secondary basis.  Currently |there is a 5MHz amateur
> > allocation at 2300-2305 in all three regions and a 10MHz allocation at
> 2390
> > - 2400.  I believe |the 2390-2400 is primary as it appears in all caps
and
> > 2300-2305 may also be primary.
> > |
> > |This doesn't mean these are available for satellite use.  The only
> bandplan
> > I have found for this spectrum comes from the |ARRL website.
> > |
> > |But it is a bandplan, and bandplans are subject to change.  For
example,
> > there is 800 KHz allocated between 2303.0 to
> > |2303.8 and another 500 KHz between 2399.0 and 2399.5 for low rate
packet.
> > Can the use of that part of the bandplan be |negotiated?  I don't know.
> > However I will be very interested in hearing Paul Renaldo's presentation
> in
> > San Francisco and |meeting with the other members of the IARU.
> > |
> > |73,
> > |
> > |Emily
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home