[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S-Band Not 2.4 but 2.3
- From: Emily Clarke <emily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:32:04 -0700
At 11:59 PM 9/9/2006, John B. Stephensen wrote:
>Unfortunately, there is no country that allows the use of 2.3 GHz for
>amateur satellites and only one country in the footprint of the satellite
>would have to object.
The detailed chart (
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/Chp04Chart.pdf - starting on page
50) is a bit fuzzy but it looks like amateur is allocated from 2300 -
2450, albeit all on a secondary basis. Currently there is a 5MHz
amateur allocation at 2300-2305 in all three regions and a 10MHz
allocation at 2390 - 2400. I believe the 2390-2400 is primary as it
appears in all caps and 2300-2305 may also be primary.
This doesn't mean these are available for satellite use. The only
bandplan I have found for this spectrum comes from the ARRL website.
But it is a bandplan, and bandplans are subject to change. For
example, there is 800 KHz allocated between 2303.0 to 2303.8 and
another 500 KHz between 2399.0 and 2399.5 for low rate packet. Can
the use of that part of the bandplan be negotiated? I don't
know. However I will be very interested in hearing Paul Renaldo's
presentation in San Francisco and meeting with the other members of the IARU.
73,
Emily
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home