[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: S band downlink on P3E
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E
- From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:09:17 -0700
Count me in too, in favor of S-band downlink. I read the engineering
argument which predicts total chaos on 2.4 ghz, and also the engineering
analysis that shows that bumble bees can't fly. To a first order
approximation, both are probably correct. Yet bees do fly, and we will be
able to make good use of 2.4 ghz on our satellites.
I also fear that our abandonment of S-band will just make things worse for
those lobbying for our spectrum. Until AO-40's "event", I had only mild
interest in 2.4 ghz. Now I have an effective 2.4 ghz receive station. It's
not optimal by any means, but having a new HEO bird on the band will give me
the incentive to improve its performance.
Bring us S-band!
Greg KO6TH
----Original Message Follows----
From: <k7zt@cox.net>
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:21:31 -0500
Ok, I ran S Band on AO-40 as well; my home, radio shack, and neighborhood
are covered with 2.4Gig stuff. The ONLY interference I ever received was in
the form of
Very short burst (pops) which any noise blanker was extreamly effective at
removing.
The 5Gig band will be in the same shape as S Band is today. I simply
don’t buy into the
Interference argument.
73's DE K7ZT, Joe
{snip}
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
AMSAT Home