[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Eagle efficiencies



> Clarification, or more fuel to the fire...
> For a *fixed overall physical size (aperture)*, antenna gain
is 
> proportional to f^2
> Pathloss is proportional to 1/f^2
> So then the total link budget actually *increases* with
increasing 
> frequency (f^2*f^2/f^2=f^2), since you have an antenna at both
ends, 

True. But that assumes you can keep the antennas at both ends
pointed at each other.  Yes, this DOES give better links at
higher frequencies but requires higher attitude control and
pointing requirements on the spacecraft.  

For LEO satelites that need OMNI antennas, then your have
F^2/F^2 and these two effects cancel each other out.

Also, the key term is the "fixed size" comparison.  Yes, phasing
together FOUR 12 foot UHF yagi's will give the same overall
"aperture" as a single 12 foot 2 meter yagi, but look how much
easier it is to build a single 2m yagi.  And then a 10 meter
Dipole will also give about the same aperture too, and it is
even simpler for the same aperture.

When you get to dishes at both ends, then I agree completely
that all things are equal.
Frequency doesn't matter, though pointing accuracy becomes
harder and harder as one goes up.
Bob

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home