[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Eagle efficiencies

Clarification, or more fuel to the fire...
For a *fixed overall physical size (aperture)*, antenna gain is 
proportional to f^2
Pathloss is proportional to 1/f^2
So then the total link budget actually *increases* with increasing 
frequency (f^2*f^2/f^2=f^2), since you have an antenna at both ends, 
subject to the assumption stated initially.
There are several 2nd-order terms to consider overall, such as decreasing 
transmitter power as frequency increases, thermal/galactic noise variations 
with freq, etc., but *for a given size* higher is better.

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb