[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Eagle efficiencies


I personally prefer lower frequencies for satellite transmitters because
of the lower path loss. Now, after viewing the power information on the
eaglepedia meeting summary, I believe electrical efficiency is another
good reason to support the lower frequencies.

>From what I saw (probably estimates), the VHF transmitter will be about
60% efficient while the C band transmitter will be about 30% efficient.

I was very happy to see a respectable 20 watts planned for the VHF output
and the same for the C band transmitter.

Thanks again to the design team. EEck out those watts and hope you have an
alternative for power storage. Some bold new idea would be great.

Patrick, N2OEQ

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb